Skip to main content

Elementor vs Bricks: Which WordPress Builder Should You Choose?

Elementor and Bricks can both build complete WordPress websites visually, but they suit different workflows.

Elementor is the safer choice for beginners, designers, marketers and teams already working in its large ecosystem. It has a free plugin, a familiar visual editor and an extensive range of integrations, templates and third-party add-ons.

Bricks is generally the stronger choice for developers and technically minded agencies that want class-based styling, dynamic data tools and more control over how a site is structured. It is installed as the active WordPress theme rather than as a plugin, and there is no downloadable free version.

The short answer

Which one should you choose?

Choose Elementor if

Best for beginners, designers, marketers, client handoff and teams already invested in the Elementor ecosystem.

  • You want the easiest entry point or need a free version.
  • You regularly hand websites over to non-technical clients.
  • You rely on Elementor-specific add-ons, templates or integrations.
  • You already maintain a collection of Elementor websites.
  • You prefer a builder that works with many WordPress themes.

Choose Bricks if

Best for developers, technical freelancers and agencies building new dynamic sites with class-based design systems.

  • You are comfortable with CSS concepts such as classes and variables.
  • You build custom, dynamic or data-driven WordPress websites.
  • You want the same core feature set on every paid plan.
  • You need an unlimited-site annual or lifetime licence.
  • You prefer a developer-oriented full-site-building workflow.

Overall: There is no universal winner. Elementor prioritises accessibility and ecosystem breadth; Bricks prioritises developer control and a cohesive full-site workflow.

Continue to the full comparison

The products

At a glance

Visual drag-and-drop WordPress website builder with theme building, forms, popups, and WooCommerce design tools in Pro.

  • Builders

From $49/yr

Visual WordPress site builder delivered as a theme, focused on dynamic data, reusable components, and performance.

  • Builders
  • Lifetime Deals

From $79/yr

Side by side

Feature and pricing comparison

AttributeElementorBricks
Product typePlugin; Elementor Pro extends the free pluginTheme with an integrated visual builder
Free versionYesNo downloadable free version; online trial available
Starting paid priceFrom $49/year$79/year for one website
Full-site templatesYes, through Theme BuilderYes
Dynamic contentYes; plan and feature dependentYes; included on every plan
FormsElementor ProIncluded on every plan
PopupsAvailable on qualifying Pro plansIncluded on every plan
WooCommerce builderAvailable on qualifying Pro plansIncluded on every plan
Class-based workflowAvailable; workflow varies by editor generationCentral to the builder workflow
Licence optionsAnnual plans; features and site limits vary1, 3 or unlimited annual plans; unlimited lifetime option
Best suited toBeginners, designers, marketers and existing Elementor teamsDevelopers, technical freelancers and custom-site agencies

Prices and plan inclusions can change. Confirm current pricing on the official product websites before purchasing.

The most important difference

Elementor is a plugin. You install it alongside a WordPress theme, with Elementor Pro adding advanced design and site-building functionality. This makes it possible to use Elementor with a wide selection of themes and to adopt it gradually.

Bricks is a theme. Installing Bricks means making it the active presentation layer of the website. Its builder, templates and theme-level controls are designed as one system.

That distinction affects migration and project planning. Moving away from either visual builder requires rebuilding builder-controlled layouts, but replacing Bricks also means changing the active theme. Elementor can remain separate from the theme, although switching away still requires replacing Elementor templates and page layouts.

Ease of use

Elementor

Elementor is usually easier for a first-time visual-builder user. The free plugin provides a practical way to learn the interface before purchasing Pro, and its panel-and-canvas editing model is familiar to a large number of WordPress professionals.

This also helps when handing a website to a client. A client may already recognise Elementor, and it is relatively easy to restrict their work to changing text, images and other page content. Complex Elementor sites can still become difficult to maintain when widgets, nested containers, custom CSS and multiple add-ons are used without a consistent system.

Bricks

Bricks is visual, but its strongest workflow rewards knowledge of HTML structure and CSS. Classes, variables, pseudo-classes, responsive breakpoints and reusable components are prominent rather than hidden.

A beginner can build with Bricks without writing code, but a user who understands CSS is more likely to benefit from what differentiates it. For developers, that learning curve can become an advantage because it encourages reusable rules instead of styling every element independently.

Ease-of-use winner: Elementor.

Design systems and reusable styling

Both builders support global styles and reusable content, but Bricks places a stronger emphasis on a class-based design system. Its Class and Variable Manager supports organising, renaming, locking, importing and exporting reusable styling values. Bricks 2 also uses Components for reusable builder structures.

Elementor provides global colours, fonts, templates and reusable elements, while its newer editor generation expands class-based styling. However, the exact workflow can differ depending on whether a site uses the established editor or newer Editor V4 features.

For a marketing team designing individual landing pages, Elementor's widget-led workflow may feel more direct. For an agency creating a repeatable system across templates and dynamic content, Bricks' CSS-oriented approach is often more natural.

Design-system winner: Bricks.

Theme building and dynamic content

Elementor Pro's Theme Builder can create headers, footers, single templates and archives. Its dynamic-content system integrates with custom-field tools including ACF, allowing stored WordPress data to populate templates.

Bricks also supports full-site templates and dynamic data. Its Query Loop Builder can retrieve posts, users, media and custom-field data, and Bricks documents integrations with ACF, Meta Box, JetEngine, Toolset, Pods and ACPT. Conditions and interactions are included in its paid plans.

Both products are suitable for custom post type websites, directories and other structured builds. Bricks gives technical users more query and structural control inside one system. Elementor may be more attractive when the project already depends on Elementor integrations or when editors need its familiar interface.

Dynamic-content winner: Bricks for developer control; Elementor for ecosystem compatibility.

WooCommerce, forms and popups

Both builders can visually design WooCommerce areas and create forms and popups.

With Elementor, these features depend on the chosen Pro plan. Elementor's current pricing page shows WooCommerce, popups, custom code and other advanced features as unavailable on its entry Essential plan but included on higher qualifying plans.

Bricks includes its WooCommerce Builder, Form element, Popup Builder, Query Loop Builder and conditions/interactions across every paid licence. Its pricing tiers primarily change the number of licensed websites rather than unlocking different builder features.

Elementor still has an advantage when a project requires a particular third-party Elementor integration or widget. Bricks has a growing add-on ecosystem, but buyers should confirm that every required integration exists before choosing it for a client build.

Built-in feature value winner: Bricks. Integration breadth winner: Elementor.

Performance

Bricks is commonly selected for performance-conscious projects because its workflow encourages reusable classes and it combines the theme and builder. That does not prove that every Bricks website is faster than every Elementor website.

Real performance depends on the layout, hosting, fonts, images, third-party scripts, plugins, caching and the person building the site. A disciplined Elementor build can perform well, while an overloaded Bricks build can still be slow.

Until WPResources runs a controlled benchmark using equivalent pages and environments, the responsible conclusion is:

  • Bricks provides a technically attractive starting point for lean custom builds.
  • Elementor performance depends heavily on build discipline and the surrounding plugin stack.
  • Do not choose solely from vendor or community benchmark claims.

Performance verdict: Bricks has the architectural advantage, but no universal speed result is claimed here.

Pricing and licensing

Elementor offers a free WordPress plugin and paid plans starting from $49 per year at the time of this review. Features and website limits vary between paid tiers, so the cheapest plan should not be assumed to include popups, WooCommerce features or every dynamic-content capability.

Bricks currently lists:

  • Starter: $79/year for 1 website.
  • Business: $149/year for 3 websites.
  • Agency: $249/year for unlimited websites.
  • Ultimate Lifetime: $599 once for unlimited websites.

Bricks states that all plans include the complete feature set, while local and staging installations do not count against licence limits. There is no downloadable free version, although Bricks provides an online trial and a 60-day money-back guarantee.

For one simple site, Elementor's free version or entry plan reduces the initial cost. For an agency that needs advanced features across many websites, Bricks' unlimited annual and lifetime options are easier to calculate.

Lowest entry cost: Elementor. Agency and long-term licence value: Bricks.

Ecosystem and client handoff

Elementor's scale is a practical advantage. WordPress.org reports more than 10 million active installations for the free plugin. That creates a large pool of tutorials, freelancers, templates and compatible products.

Bricks is aimed more directly at professional site builders. Its official feature set includes custom elements, action hooks, dynamic data, classes, variables and reusable components. These are valuable for an agency that will continue maintaining the website, but a non-technical client may need a more controlled editing workflow.

If a client already has a functioning Elementor website, rebuilding it solely to move to Bricks rarely makes commercial sense. If you are starting a new custom site and the developer will remain responsible for maintenance, Bricks deserves serious consideration.

Which builder should you choose?

Choose Elementor for a small-business or marketing website

Elementor is the safer recommendation when rapid visual editing, a large template ecosystem and straightforward client familiarity matter more than a developer-centric CSS workflow.

Choose Bricks for a custom dynamic website

Bricks is the stronger fit when the website uses custom post types, custom fields, query-driven templates and a carefully managed design system.

Choose Elementor for an existing Elementor estate

Consistency is valuable. Agencies already maintaining many Elementor websites should not introduce another builder without a clear operational benefit.

Choose Bricks for a new developer-managed agency build

The class-based workflow, full feature set and unlimited-site licensing can make Bricks attractive when a technical team controls the build and ongoing maintenance.

Elementor vs Bricks: final recommendation

Choose Elementor when accessibility, familiarity and ecosystem breadth are the priorities. It remains the easier recommendation for beginners, content teams and businesses that want to find support easily.

Choose Bricks when you want a more developer-oriented system for a new custom WordPress build. Its classes, variables, components, query tools and licensing make it particularly compelling for technical freelancers and agencies.

For many WPResources readers, the decision is less about which builder is objectively better and more about who will maintain the site. Elementor is easier to hand over broadly. Bricks is often better when a skilled builder retains responsibility for the system.

Pricing

Bricks plans

PlanPriceWebsites
Starter$79/year1
Business$149/year3
Agency$249/yearUnlimited
Ultimate Lifetime$599 onceUnlimited

Next step

Visit the products

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Bricks faster than Elementor?
Bricks offers a strong foundation for lean, class-based builds, but page speed also depends on hosting, images, fonts, scripts, plugins, caching and implementation quality. WPResources has not yet published a controlled head-to-head benchmark.
Is Bricks a plugin or a theme?
Bricks is installed as a WordPress theme. Elementor is a plugin that works with a WordPress theme; Elementor Pro extends the free Elementor plugin.
Does Bricks have a free version?
No downloadable free version is available. Bricks provides an online trial and currently advertises a 60-day money-back guarantee.
Can both builders use ACF?
Yes. Elementor supports ACF through dynamic-content features, while Bricks documents direct dynamic-data integration with ACF and several other custom-field tools.
Is Elementor better for clients?
It is often easier to hand Elementor sites to clients because the editor is widely recognised and extensively documented. A carefully configured Bricks site can also provide a controlled editing experience.
Can I switch from Elementor to Bricks automatically?
There is no dependable one-click conversion for complete production websites. Builder-controlled templates and layouts generally need to be recreated and checked manually.

Transparency

Editorial sources

Editorial note: Feature and pricing facts were checked against official sources on 4 September 2026. Recommendations are editorial judgments based on the documented workflows and the author's professional WordPress and Elementor experience. No original controlled performance benchmark is claimed.